Publications

@article{Moutel2022cf,

title = {La disparition progressive de la professionnalisation de la photographie médicale dans les hôpitaux français constitue-t-elle une atteinte à l’éthique ?},

author = {Séverine Leblanc and Mylène Gouriot and Maud Charvin and Rémy Morello},

doi = { https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etiqe.2022.09.003},

issn = {ISSN 1765-4629},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-17},

urldate = {2022-10-17},

journal = {Ethique et Santé},

abstract = {Introduction

Bien que fréquemment utilisée dans les établissements de santé, la photographie médicale fait l’objet d’aucune réglementation spécifique ou recommandations précises. L’objet de cette étude est de réaliser une enquête qualitative sur les pratiques photographiques en lien avec le respect de l’éthique médicale, de la déontologie et du droit.



Matériel et méthode

L’échantillon a été constitué de 8 professionnels de santé exerçant dans le quart ouest de la France au sein de trois CHU. Des entretiens semi-directifs ont été menés en suivant une grille construite par thématiques déductive sur 6 mois entre avril et août 2020.



Résultats

Plusieurs problématiques ont été mises en lumière avec en particulier un manque de formation et l’utilisation de matériels non adaptés, une qualité d’images toutes relatives, ainsi qu’une grande hétérogénéité qui porte atteinte en particulier au droit à l’information, au respect du consentement et à l’anonymisation.



Conclusion

L’absence de normes et l’absence de formations professionnalisantes constituent de profondes insuffisances, source de préjudices potentiels à plus ou moins long terme, aussi bien pour les patients que pour les établissements de santé touchant à l’éthique, et ce d’autant plus graves qu’ils risquent de porter atteinte à la maîtrise de l’évolution de la communication par l’image.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Suzat2022,

title = {Quels freins à l’établissement du certificat de décès à domicile ? Enquête auprès de médecins sur le territoire de Normandie},

author = {Bertille Suzat and Maud Charvin and Mylène Gouriot and Guillaume Grandazzi and Grégoire Moutel},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2022.07.004},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-27},

urldate = {2022-09-27},

journal = {Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique},

abstract = {Introduction

La rédaction du certificat de décès est une obligation pour tout médecin appelé à constater un décès. Il a un impact légal et épidémiologique. L'objectif de cette étude est de mettre en évidence les freins rencontrés par les professionnels lors de cette démarche à domicile.



Méthode

Une étude a été menée au moyen d'un questionnaire, adressé à des médecins sur le territoire de Normandie.



Résultats

Au total, 20 % des médecins traitants généralistes, 25 % des praticiens du SAMU (intervenant en urgence mobile sur le territoire), 27,3 % de SOS médecins (intervenant 24h/24 au domicile en absence de médecin généraliste) énonçaient avoir déjà refusé d’établir un certificat de décès. Seuls 36,4 % de SOS médecins, 62,5 % des praticiens urgentistes SAMU et 41 % des médecins généralistes estiment que la rédaction du certificat de décès fait partie de leurs missions obligatoires ; 17 % des médecins généralistes, 25 % des médecins SAMU, et 9 % de SOS médecins ont déclaré ne pas pouvoir parfois se déplacer pour remplir un certificat de décès faute de temps, ce qui occasionne des retards préjudiciables en particulier pour les proches. Nous avons mis en évidence plusieurs autres freins à la rédaction des certificats de décès, tels que la difficulté à le remplir avec exactitude face à l'absence de connaissance des antécédents de la personne décédée, les difficultés ou l'impossibilité de gérer ces demandes imprévues dans le cadre d'une activité chargée, et, plus rarement, la question de l'absence de rémunération.



Conclusion

Notre étude objective des freins dans l’établissement des certificats de décès importants à considérer compte tenu de leur impact sur la qualité des données collectées et sur les enjeux éthiques que cela révèle.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022cg,

title = {Cancer et gériatrie : entre respect de l'autonomie et vulnérabilité, quelle éthique de la décision ?},

author = {Grégoire Moutel},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-08},

urldate = {2022-09-08},

journal = {La Lettre du Cancérologue},

volume = {XXXI},

number = {8},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022cc,

title = {Interrompre une grossesse en réanimation sans recueil du consentement de la patiente : enjeux éthiques et médico-légaux},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Pauline Goupille and Bertille Suzat and Jean-Philippe Rigaud and Maud Charvin and Guillaume Grandazzi and Mylène Gouriot and Clément Gakuba and Thomas Gaberel and Guillaume Benoist},

doi = {10.37051/mir-00095},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-06},

urldate = {2022-09-06},

journal = {Médecine Intensive Réanimation},

volume = {31},

number = {2},

pages = {77-84},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022cb,

title = {Don du corps à la science et usages des corps à finalités pédagogiques et scientifiques : enjeux éthiques et perspectives pour demain},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Christophe Destrieux and Bertille Suzat and Maud Charvin and Patrick Baqué and Stéphane Ploteau and Mylène Gouriot and Guillaume Grandazzi},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2022.02.019},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-05},

urldate = {2022-09-05},

journal = {Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine},

volume = {206},

number = {8},

pages = {1043-1050},

abstract = {Le don du corps à la science est essentiel et indispensable pour l’enseignement de l’anatomie, l’apprentissage et l’amélioration des pratiques chirurgicales ; il l’est également pour la recherche dans de nombreuses spécialités médicales. Il s’agit d’un don volontaire, fait du vivant du patient, par écrit, auprès des centres de don dans de nombreuses facultés de médecine en France. Il s’impose aux proches mais peut heurter des consciences. Malgré la grande qualité et la grande rigueur de travail de la majorité des centres du don en France, un certain nombre de problèmes et de questions nouvelles ont émergé ces dernières années. Ces questions concernent les modalités d’information du donateur sur les usages possibles des corps, l’information des proches sur cette démarche, les frais de transports des corps, les modalités de traçabilité de la volonté des défunts, le devenir des cendres après utilisation des corps quant aux conditions de retour ou non aux familles, mais aussi les moyens et la logistique des centres. Du fait de toutes ces questions et de la problématique d’un centre parisien de don où la dignité des corps a été mise à mal, le législateur a souhaité s’emparer du sujet à travers les nouvelles lois de bioéthique de 2021. Les pratiques et règles éthiques autour de la pratique du don du corps à la science vont donc évoluer dans les années à venir. Cet article fait le point sur les évolutions à anticiper et sur les questions éthiques qu’elles soulèvent en regard de la symbolique du corps mort et du respect de la dignité des défunts.},

keywords = {Accès aux soins, Décision partagée, Organisation du système de santé, Place de l'éthique dans le soin},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022cd,

title = {Directives anticipées et fin de vie : un outil à proposer et valoriser sans pour autant l’imposer},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Maud Charvin and Bertille Suzat and Mylène Gouriot and Guillaume Grandazzi},

doi = {http://doi.org/10.1684/hpg.2022.2338},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-05},

urldate = {2022-09-05},

journal = {Hépato-Gastro et Oncologie Digestive},

volume = {29},

number = {3},

pages = {289-94},

abstract = {Les directives anticipées : un outil qui s’inscrit dans une évolution de la relation soignant-soigné et des droits des patients Dans une conception hippocratique, la relation médecin – patient découle directement de la morale aristotélicienne en se fondant sur le primum non nocere1. Historiquement, l’action médicale ayant pour finalité de faire du bien, en s’abstenant de nuire, elle se référait au principe [...]},

keywords = {Fin de vie, Information},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022ce,

title = {COVID et privation du droit de visites en établissement sanitaire et médico-social : maintenir la relation et penser l'usage des outils numériques},

author = {Mylène Gouriot and Maud Charvin and Bertille Suzat and Grégoire Moutel and Guillaume Grandazzi},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-05},

urldate = {2022-09-05},

journal = {Journal International de Bioéthique},

volume = {33},

number = {2},

pages = {63-85},

keywords = {Information},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Papet2022,

title = {Methodological and ethical quality of surgical trials from 2016 to 2020},

author = {Eloise Papet and Grégoire Moutel and Jean Pinson and Matthieu Monge and Edouard Roussel and Tom Teniere and Jean-Jacques Tuech and Valérie Bridoux },

doi = {10.1007/s00423-022-02649-8},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-27},

urldate = {2022-08-27},

journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},

abstract = {Purpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard tool used to evaluate therapeutic interventions. The published results showed that progress still needs to be made not only from a methodological point of view but also from an ethical point of view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodological and ethical qualities of randomized clinical trials in surgery over the last few years.



Methods: All of the articles chosen for review reported on randomized controlled surgical trials and were published in 10 international journals between 2016 and 2020. Eligible studies were identified, selected, and then evaluated based on a broad set of predetermined criteria. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and ethical quality was evaluated using the Berdeu score.



Results: The methodological quality score (Jadad scale) ranged from 5 to 13, with a mean of 10.0 ± 1.54. The methodological quality was insufficient (score ≤ 9) for 162 trials (31.2%). The ethical quality score ranged from 0.25 to 1, with a mean of 0.8 ± 0.11. Fifty-two articles (10%) did not state that informed consent was requested from the participants, and 21 articles (4%) did not report either research ethics committee or institutional committee protocol approval.



Conclusion: The randomized clinical surgical trials analyzed showed that they had satisfactory methods in only 70% of the cases and that they had respected the fundamental ethical principles in 90% of the cases. However, less than 8% of the studies reported planned interim analysis, prospectively defined stopping rules, and independent monitoring committee.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Huck2022,

title = {Information et consentement sur l’épisiotomie : Comment améliorer les pratiques ?},

author = {Joséphine Huck and Grégoire Moutel and Sophie Baumann},

doi = {10.3917/spub.222.0243},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-06-01},

urldate = {2022-06-01},

journal = {Santé Publique},

volume = {34},

number = {2},

pages = {243-253},

abstract = {Intro Context and subject of the study: While women are increasingly demanding to be actors of their birth and to participate in the choices concerning their care, a study showed in 2013 that the information they received concerning episiotomy had improved, but that consent was very rarely sought. The interest of our study was therefore to explore the practices of midwives a few years later, and to highlight the factors that may encourage or hinder them in the delivery room to inform women and obtain their consent.



Method: We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with midwives working in the delivery room in several maternity hospitals in the Ile-de-France region. A manual content analysis was carried out independently by two researchers who then compared their results. A complementary analysis using NVivo software confirmed the validity of the manual analysis.



Results: Information on episiotomy and collection of consent in the delivery room were respectively limited by the anxiety-inducing nature of the information and its temporality (labour and delivery are not appropriate times for information according to the professionals), and by the fear of refusal. Information given beforehand during pregnancy and the drafting of a birth plan would facilitate the collection of consent in the delivery room.



Conclusion: A time dedicated to information and the distribution of an information leaflet on episiotomy to patients could help improve the practices of health professionals.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2022c,

title = {L'accès aux traitements pour tous de manière égalitaire restera-t-il la règle ?},

author = {Grégoire Moutel},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-05-01},

journal = {La Lettre du Neurologue},

volume = {26},

number = {5},

pages = {165-166},

keywords = {Accès aux soins, Droit des patients, Régulation de l'accès à l'innovation, Traitements onéreux},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Charvin2022,

title = {Perceptions et connaissances concernant la décision de réaliser le dépistage du cancer de la prostate},

author = {Maud Charvin and Grégoire Moutel and Guy Launoy and Célia Berchi},

doi = {10.3917/spub.221.0107},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-05-01},

urldate = {2022-05-01},

journal = {Santé Publique},

volume = {34},

number = {1},

pages = {107-118},

abstract = {Background: Because of the benefit-risk ratio, the French health authorities recommend that patients make an informed choice concerning prostate cancer screening. The aim of this study was to investigate men's decision process. The process was explored by assessing information-seeking behavior, knowledge on prostate cancer, and men's involvement in screening decisions.



Methods: Nineteen men aged 50 to 75 years old were included in the study in 2018. Semi structured face-to-face interviews were performed. Interviews were audio-recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed.



Results: In some cases, men's knowledge about prostate anatomy, prostate physiology, and prostate cancer screening modalities (procedure and risks) was poor. Moreover, despite international recommendations about shared decision-making, several GPs (General Practitioner) prescribed prostate cancer screening without discussing the matter with their patients.



Conclusion: French men should receive better information so that they can make an informed choice about prostate cancer screening and share the decision with their GP.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Pasquier2022,

title = {How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis},

author = {Laurent Pasquier and Guy Minguet and Sylvie Moisdon-Chataigner and Pascal Jarno and Philippe Denizeau and Ginette Volf and Sylvie Odent and Grégoire Moutel },

doi = {10.1038/s41431-021-00884-z},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-03-30},

urldate = {2022-03-30},

journal = {European Journal of Human Genetics},

volume = {30},

number = {3},

pages = {320-331},

abstract = {Genetic testing is accepted to be a common practice in many medical specialties. These genetic tests raise issues such as respect for basic rights, how to handle results and uncertainty and how to balance concerns for medical confidentiality with the rights of third parties. Physicians need help to deal with the rapid development of genomic medicine as most of them have received no specific training on the medical, ethical, and social issues involved. Analyzing how these professionals integrate genetic testing into the patient-provider relationship is essential to paving the way for a better use of genomics by all. We conducted a qualitative study comprising a series of focus groups with 21 neurologists and endocrinologists about their genetic testing practices in the western part of France. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed for major themes. We identified an automated care management procedure of genetic testing that affects patient autonomy. The simple fact of having a written consent cannot justify a genetic test given the stakes associated with the results. We also suggest orienting practices toward a systemic approach using a multidisciplinary team or network to provide resources for dealing with uncertainties in interpreting results or situations that require additional technical or clinical skills and, if necessary, to allow for joint consultations with both a geneticist and a non-geneticist medical specialist.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2021,

title = {Le Codeem, Comité de déontovigilance et d’éthique des entreprises du médicament : un exemple d’autorégulation innovant dans le domaine de la responsabilité sociétale},

author = {Grégoire Moutel },

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2021.06.019},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-12-01},

journal = {Bull Acad Nat Med},

volume = {205},

number = {9},

pages = {1161-1167},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2021b,

title = {Donner sa peau après sa mort pour traiter et sauver les autres : regard éthique},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Maud Charvin and Bertille Suzat},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-11-01},

urldate = {2021-11-01},

journal = {Images en dermatologie},

volume = {14},

number = {6},

keywords = {Don de peau, Médecine légale},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2021c,

title = {Médecine légale et prise en charge des victimes de violences : ce que nous dit la peau pour éclairer la justice},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Bertille Suzat},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-11-01},

urldate = {2021-11-01},

journal = {Images en dermatologie},

volume = {14},

number = {6},

keywords = {Médecine légale},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Rollet2021,

title = {Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival –a registry- based study},

author = {Quentin Rollet and Véronique Bouvier and Grégoire Moutel and Ludivine Launay and Anne-Laure Bignon and Karine Bouhier-Leporrier and Guy Launoy and Astrid Lièvre},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-10-01},

journal = {BMC Health Services Research},

volume = {21:1032},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Pouget-Abadie2021,

title = {Le serment d’Hippocrate : source vive de l’éthique médicale.},

author = {Jean-François Pouget-Abadie},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-08-05},

urldate = {2021-08-05},

journal = {Revue de bioéthique de Nouvelle-Aquitaine},

number = {8},

pages = {51-54},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Pouget-Abadie2021b,

title = {Vivre la pandémie Covid 19 ou le refus de la polémique et le choix de l’éthique},

author = {Jean-François Pouget-Abadie},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-08-05},

urldate = {2021-08-05},

journal = {Revue de bioéthique de Nouvelle-Aquitaine},

number = {8},

pages = {55-60},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Raoul-Cormeil2021b,

title = {Médiator : première condamnation pénale. Les leçons d'un scandale sanitaire},

author = {Gilles Raoul-Cormeil},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-01},

urldate = {2021-06-01},

journal = {Revue générale de droit médical},

number = {79},

pages = {93-110},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Rigaud2021,

title = {Sédation profonde et continue maintenue jusqu’au décès en réanimation : mise au point de la Commission d’Éthique de la SRLF},

author = { Jean-Philippe Rigaud and Jean Reignier and René Robert and Lilia Soufir and Mathieu Série and Laure De-Saint-Blanquat and Thierry Boulain and Alexandra Laurent and Sylvain Lavoué and Maxime Elbaz and Bénédicte Gaillard-Le-Roux and Benoit Misset and Virginie Lemiale and Zoé Cohen-Solal and Emmanuelle Mercier and Anne-Laure Poujol and Chaouki Mezher and Cyril Goulenok and Raphaëlle David and Régis Queré and Gwendolyn Penven and Bertrand Quentin and Jean-Pierre Quenot and Olivier Lesieur},

doi = {10.37051/mir-00079 },

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-05-25},

journal = {Médecine Intensive Réanimation},

volume = {30},

number = {3},

pages = {271-276},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Pasquier2021,

title = {How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis},

author = {Laurent Pasquier and Guy Minguet and Sylvie Moisdon-Chataigner and Pascal Jarno and Philippe Denizeau and Ginette Volf and Sylvie Odent and Grégoire Moutel },

doi = {10.1038/s41431-021-00884-z.},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-04-28},

journal = {European Journal of Human Genetics},

keywords = {Génétique},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Raoul-Cormeil2021,

title = {Cent ans de droit des patients, à l'aune de la fin de vie},

author = {Gilles Raoul-Cormeil},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-03-01},

journal = {Revue Droit & Santé},

number = {100},

pages = {121-131},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Gatti2021,

title = {Covid-19 : le consentement à l’acte vaccinal  des majeurs vulnérables  ou l’éprouvante réception du régime des décisions de santé des majeurs protégés},

author = {Laurence Gatti and Gilles Raoul-Cormeil},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-03-01},

journal = {Revue générale de droit médical},

number = {78},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Baumann2021,

title = {Termination of pregnancy for foetal indication in the French context analysis of decision-making in a Multidisciplinary Centre For Prenatal Diagnosis},

author = {Sophie Baumann and Sylviane Darquy and Claire Miry and Nathalie Duchange and Grégoire Moutel },

doi = { 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102067},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-21},

journal = {Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction},

volume = {50},

number = {8},

keywords = {Diagnostic pré-natal},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Thibault2020,

title = {Prise en charge de l’intersexuation en France},

author = {Léa Thibault and Audrey Boisgontier and Maud Charvin and Guillaume Grandazzi and Grégoire Moutel },

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-01},

journal = {La revue du praticien },

volume = {70},

number = {10},

pages = {1069-75},

keywords = {Décision partagée, Refus de soins},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Labruyère2020,

title = {Family perceptions of clinical research and the informed consent processin the ICU},

author = {Marie Labruyère and Nicolas Meunier-Beillard and FionaEcarnot and Audrey Large and François Aptel and Jean-Baptiste Roudaut and Pascal Andreu and Auguste Dargent and Jean-Philippe Rigaud and Jean-Pierre Quenot},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.032},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-09-28},

journal = {Journal of Critical Care},

keywords = {Recherche},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Eustache-Vallée2020,

title = {Vivre une période de confinement pour les patients Alzheimer en Résidence pour personnes âgées dépendantes},

author = {Marie-Loup Eustache-Vallée},

doi = {10.1684/nrp.2020.0562},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-09-01},

journal = {Revue de neuropsychologie},

volume = {12},

number = {2},

pages = {171-174},

keywords = {Covid-19, Gérontologie},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Tenenbaum2020,

title = {Implementation of a medical ethics course in undergraduate dental education and assessment of knowledge and attitudes},

author = {Annabelle Tenenbaum and Grégoire Moutel and Maryse Wolikow and Amandine Vial-Dupuy and Sylvie Azogui-Levy},

doi = {10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_364_19},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-08-31},

journal = {Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry},

volume = {10},

number = {5},

pages = {569-578},

keywords = {Formation médicale},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Raginel2020,

title = {Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening:  a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists},

author = {Thibaut Raginel and Guillaume Grandazzi and Guy Launoy and Mélanie Trocmé and Véronique Christophe and Célia Berchi and Lydia Guittet},

doi = {10.1186/s12913-020-05479-w},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-08-27},

journal = {BMC Health Services Research},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Karaca2020,

title = {La place du patient dans la hiérarchisation des parties prenantes en établissement de soin : un indicateur du souci éthique du management},

author = {Sila Karaca and Guillaume Grandazzi and Pauline Lenesley},

doi = {10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.05.004},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-08-07},

journal = {Ethique et Santé},

volume = {17},

number = {3},

pages = {173-180},

keywords = {Place de l'éthique dans le soin},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Charvin2020,

title = {The effect of information on prostate cancer screening decision process: a discrete choice experiment},

author = {Maud Charvin and Guy Launoy and Célia Berchi },

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05327-x},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-05-26},

journal = {BMC Health Services Research},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers, Information},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2020,

title = {Le refus de soins, des situations complexes},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Bertille Suzat and Guillaume Grandazzi },

doi = {10.1016/j.revinf.2020.01.003},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-21},

journal = {La Revue de l’Infirmière},

volume = {69},

number = {258},

pages = {16-18},

keywords = {Refus de soins},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2020b,

title = {Le refus de soin, un acte discriminatoire ?},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Bertille Suzat and Guillaume Grandazzi },

doi = {10.1016/j.revinf.2020.01.007},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-21},

journal = {La Revue de l’Infirmière},

volume = {69},

number = {258},

pages = {27-28},

keywords = {Refus de soins},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Grandazzi2020,

title = {Les directives anticipées : opportunité ou injonction ? Retours d’expériences et questionnements éthiques sur la mise en œuvre du dispositif en Normandie},

author = {Guillaume Grandazzi and Edouard Duchemin and Thierry Grenet and Bertille Suzat and Grégoire Moutel},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etiqe.2020.03.003},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-09},

journal = {Éthique & Santé},

keywords = {Fin de vie},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{de-Champs-Léger2020,

title = {Principes de justice et de responsabilité : regard sur l’accès aux soins avant, pendant et après la crise du Covid},

author = { Hélène de-Champs-Léger and Grégoire Moutel },

editor = {La revue du praticien},

url = {https://www.larevuedupraticien.fr/article/principes-de-justice-et-de-responsabilite-regard-sur-lacces-aux-soins-avant-pendant-et},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-01},

journal = {La Revue du Praticien},

volume = {70},

number = {4},

pages = {377-378},

keywords = {Covid-19},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Tousignant2020,

title = {Séries de suicide impliquant des adolescents et des jeunes : culture et transmission intergénérationnelle},

author = {Michel Tousignant and Geneviève Garneau and Eliseu Carbonell and Guillaume Grandazzi and Nathalie Morin},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1051/ppsy/202059156},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-01},

journal = {Perspectives Psy},

volume = {59},

number = {2},

pages = {156-163},

keywords = {Suicide},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Quenot2020,

title = {Criteria deemed important by the relatives for designating a reference person for patients hospitalized in ICU},

author = {Jean-Pierre Quenot and Nicolas Meunier-Beillard and Eléa Ksiazek and Caroline Abdulmalak and Samia Berrichi and Hervé Devilliers and Fiona Ecarnot and Audrey Large and Jean-Baptiste Roudaut and Pascal Andreu and Auguste Dargent and Jean-Philippe Rigaud},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.017},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-02-26},

journal = {Journal of Critical Care},

volume = {57},

keywords = {Personne de confiance},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Barde2020,

title = {Fraude scientifique : une menace majeure pour la recherche médicale},

author = {F Barde and Nathan Peiffer-Smadja and Arnaud de-La-Blanchardière},

doi = {10.1016/j.revmed.2020.02.004},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-02-25},

journal = {La Revue de Médecine Interne},

volume = {41},

number = {5},

pages = {330-334},

keywords = {Recherche},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Benoit2020,

title = {Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial },

author = {Alexandra Benoit and Michael Grynberg and Rémy Morello and Nathalie Sermondade and Guillaume Grandazzi and Grégoire Moutel},

doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031739},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-02-10},

journal = {BMJ Open},

keywords = {Décision partagée, Information},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Pasquier2019,

title = {Population genetic screening: current issues in a European country},

author = {Laurent Pasquier and Bertrand Isidor and Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag and Sylvie Odent and Guy Minguet and Grégoire Moutel},

doi = {10.1038/s41431-019-0425-2},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-05-08},

journal = {European journal of human genetics},

volume = {27},

number = {9},

pages = {1321-1323},

keywords = {Génétique},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Babin2020,

title = {Paradoxes of the French health care system},

author = {Emmanuel Babin and Guillaume Grandazzi},

url = {https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02285981},

doi = {10.1016/j.anorl.2019.02.011},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-03-22},

journal = {European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases},

volume = {136},

number = {3},

pages = {149-150},

keywords = {Organisation du système de santé},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Grandazzi2019,

title = {Impact of head and neck cancer on partner's sociability },

author = {Guillaume Grandazzi and Lise Marie Roussel and Florence Cuny and Fabrice Morlais and Ludivine Launay and Emmanuel Babin },

url = {https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02285984},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2019.02.017},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-03-14},

journal = {European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases},

volume = {136},

number = {3},

pages = {165-168},

keywords = {Aidants},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bouillaut2019,

title = {Le devenir socio-économique des mères adolescentes, dix ans plus tard},

author = {Amélie Bouillaut and Guillaume Grandazzi and Nathalie Brielle },

url = {https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02285989},

doi = {10.1016/j.sagf.2018.10.002 },

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-02-25},

journal = {La Revue Sage-Femme},

volume = {18},

number = {1},

pages = {1-6},

keywords = {Maternité},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Jullian2019,

title = {Apport de la réflexion éthique dans l’évolution des programmes de dépistage organisé des cancers},

author = {Odile Jullian and Sylviane Darquy and Grégoire Moutel and Nathalie Duchange},

url = {https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-02124282/},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

journal = {La Revue du Praticien},

volume = {69},

number = {1},

pages = {107-109},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2019,

title = {Éthique et dépistages organisés des cancers en France},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Sylviane Darquy and Odile Jullian and Nathalie Duchange},

doi = {10.3917/spub.197.0067},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Santé Publique},

volume = {HS2},

number = {S2},

pages = {67-74},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Moutel2019b,

title = {Low participation in organized colorectal cancer screening in France: underlying ethical issues},

author = {Grégoire Moutel and Nathalie Duchange and Astrid Lièvre and Marie Brigitte Orgerie and Odile Jullian and Hélène Sancho-Garnier and Sylviane Darquy},

url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01657936},

doi = {10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000417},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

journal = {European Journal of Cancer Prevention},

volume = {28},

number = {1},

pages = {27-32},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Darquy2018,

title = {Towards equity in organised cancer screening: the case of cervical cancer screening in France},

author = {Sylviane Darquy and Grégoire Moutel and Odile Jullian and Stéphanie Barré and Nathalie Duchange},

doi = {10.1186/s12905-018-0683-0},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-11-26},

journal = {BMC Womens health},

volume = {18},

number = {1},

keywords = {Dépistage des cancers},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}